On the battlefield, there's always images of, wait a minute, if drones and autonomous agents are running everything, you've got autonomous vehicles and autonomous weaponry, Who makes the decision? 

What's the impact of the commander and the leadership? And how does that translate to the war fighters or war machines? I think that you always want your system to act as an autonomous as it can. 

But you always need the human factor in order to control it. And when you send those autonomous vehicles into battle, someone going to watch them from behind. 

Someone give them their orders. Someone is trying to see if they are working properly and should be able to stop the mission or to change the mission if you think that it's required. 

So I cannot just now point where their system would be autonomous, totally autonomous, or where the human factor comes into the picture. 

I would say that the best solution is a combination between them two. And I think that that's what the world is going to.