What we're saying is the mistake that we see companies making is allow one of their vendors that are selling components to define Their sovereignty strategy, that's the failure mode. 

No vendor can confer sovereignty because the sovereignty is ultimately determined by the enterprise and it's the risk that you are taking and it's your decision. 

So Amit, what's the minimum control plane that an enterprise has to be able to retain so it can use vendors, these vendors and other vendors, without surrendering control of the entire system? 

How does that get architected? So this builds on my previous response. We see that an agentic operating system as a minimal value of technology stack that moves you towards a sovereign portion.